There is no data to support such supposed majority. But even so, free, libre, open source communities are not democracies. Imagine the quality of code or argumentation based on perceived majorities? If science would be a democracy, the earth would be "still" flat.
On 22/09/19 6:04 p. m., Steve Quezadas wrote: > I would say that the majority don't seem to be in favor of it. This > should be a democracy. > > On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 1:53 PM Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas > <offray.l...@mutabit.com <mailto:offray.l...@mutabit.com>> wrote: > > > On 22/09/19 3:38 p. m., Steve Quezadas wrote: > > > The discussion so far shows that CoC is not a distraction to many > > > > Actually, the discussion shows that the CoC is "a distraction to > many". > > Actually it shows that some people consider it a distraction, others > don't. I think that every body here is able to form its own opinion on > that and invest time and effort accordingly. > > Cheers, > > Offray > > >
