On Sunday 30 March 2003 17:36, Michael Wardle uttered: > A user on this list recently mentioned that he liked pico as a text > editor, and was disappointed that pine had been removed from the Shrike > distribution. > > I understand Red Hat's reasons for removing pine, however I am a little > surprised to not see packages for the GNU pico clone "nano" in Phoebe 3, > and suspect it is therefore not included in Shrike. I find this odd, > because I'm pretty sure it was included in previous releases, including > Valhalla. > > A number of newbie users seem to prefer nano over vi or emacs, so I'd > like Red Hat to consider once again including nano in its distribution > package set, particularly now that pine and pico are gone. > > Thanks for your consideration
Um, I thought pine was depreciated, not fully removed yet. Am I wrong? -- Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE http://geek.j2solutions.net Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -- Phoebe-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
