On 31 Mar 2003, Michael Wardle wrote: >> Does it not have the same licansing problem pine has?? > >UW Pico does, GNU Nano does not, hence the request for Nano to be >included before or when Pico is dropped.
nano is unlikely to be included as long as pine is included in the distro. Once pine is officially removed from the distro, nano is a possibility if someone is willing to maintain it I guess. -- Mike A. Harris ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris OS Systems Engineer - XFree86 maintainer - Red Hat -- Phoebe-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
