On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On 31 Mar 2003, Michael Wardle wrote:
>
> >> Does it not have the same licansing problem pine has??
> >
> >UW Pico does, GNU Nano does not, hence the request for Nano to be
> >included before or when Pico is dropped.
>
> nano is unlikely to be included as long as pine is included in
> the distro. Once pine is officially removed from the distro,
> nano is a possibility if someone is willing to maintain it I
> guess.
Since last I knew you were the maintainer of pine, how much longer do I have
to find a replacment. I know I have at least 6 months since that is the approx.
time to next release but......
Seriously though, have you found a good replacment for pine? If so what is it?
--
.............Tom "Nothing would please me more than being able to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hire ten programmers and deluge the hobby market
with good software." -- Bill Gates 1976
We are still waiting ....
--
Phoebe-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
