On 31 Mar 2003, Michael Wardle wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 12:29, Tom Diehl wrote:
> > > Anyway, it would still be nice for there to be a lightweight
> > > command-line editor that is easy to learn. Nano has been included in
> > > the past, and I hope Red Hat will again include it in future.
> >
> > Does it not have the same licansing problem pine has??
>
> UW Pico does, GNU Nano does not, hence the request for Nano to be
> included before or when Pico is dropped.
Aah!! I never used it myself. I thought someone said it was from UW.
I stand corrected.
Thanks,
--
.............Tom "Nothing would please me more than being able to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hire ten programmers and deluge the hobby market
with good software." -- Bill Gates 1976
We are still waiting ....
--
Phoebe-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
