Brad Lafountain wrote: > Ok, > > But take ext/domxml it requires a newerversion of libxml2. I didn't have it > installed on my machine when i installed php. If we bundle say a specfic > version of libxml2 that domxml depends on, then it won't matter how fast pased > the development is, ext/domxml won't use it. We can obvisouly peridocially > upgrade the version that is bundled and you can have an override if you want to > use a different version that is installed on a system. As xml gets more and > more popular i feel that domxml will be more and more popular. > > "Build outta the box"
+1 for libxml2 bundle. This already discussed, isn't this? ext/xml/libxml2 ? Odd location, but domxml support without xml does not make much sense to me. -- Yasuo Ohgaki -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
