On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 08:12:27AM +0900, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote :
> Brad Lafountain wrote:
> >Ok,
> >
> > But take ext/domxml it requires a newerversion of libxml2. I didn't have
> > it
> >installed on my machine when i installed php. If we bundle say a specfic
> >version of libxml2 that domxml depends on, then it won't matter how fast
> >pased
> >the development is, ext/domxml won't use it. We can obvisouly peridocially
> >upgrade the version that is bundled and you can have an override if you
> >want to
> >use a different version that is installed on a system. As xml gets more and
> >more popular i feel that domxml will be more and more popular.
> >
> > "Build outta the box"
>
> +1 for libxml2 bundle. This already discussed, isn't this?
-1
It's very actively developed. What is the reason of shared
libraries if we don't use it?! GD is a completely different
story. I even think it's not necessary to bundle
libmysqlclient because it's really installed everywhere where
mysql is available.
- Markus
--
GnuPG Key: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/C2272BD0.asc
Wishlist: http://guru.josefine.at/~mfischer/wishlist
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
