On Friday, August 5, 2016 at 2:01:09 PM UTC-5, Michael Cullum wrote: > > Without further comment, the TL;DR of FIG 3.0: http://bit.ly/fig-3-0
If I am reading this correctly, the Editor and Sponsor of a PSR would both have to be members of FIG? And then also find 3 other "random" people to form a 5 person working group? Doesn't that imply that non-members would be at a distinct disadvantage to create and propose ideas to FIG? PSR-15 and PSR-17 would be nowhere if FIG 3.0 had been in place when they were initiated. On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Paul Jones <pmjone...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Let it be free of the history and accomplishments (and baggage) of the FIG, > and build a following of its own through its own new accomplishments. I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. -- Woody Gilk http://about.me/shadowhand -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to php-fig+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to php-fig@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/CAGOJM6Je1QymL-hFR%3DMb%3Dh%2Bv-8kDXKtbr6yr47DtrjcizZ1K%2BQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
