On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Zeev Suraski <z...@zend.com> wrote:
> I agree that this doesn't belong to the frontpage, nor do we did ever have
> stuff like this there.
>
> But I also think that removing it would do more harm than good at this
> point.
>
>
>
> Why?  What’s bad about properly retracting it and explaining it wasn’t
> meant for www.php.net?  I’m not arguing for a 404.
>
>
>
> I also think that having a easier to understand channel and posts like this
> to communicate the roadmap and development of the project would be a nice
> thing to have (as long as we don't try to use the frontpage for that).
>
> Agreed.
>
> So I would suggest checking out the updated version from Levi, and discuss
> if it still has any controversial stuff.
>
>
>
> Again I have a hard time accepting it as the very existence of the post on
> the front page is controversial.  I’ll wait until I see the new text but I
> have a hard time imagining what it would look like that would fit
> www.php.net’s <http://www.php.net's> front page.

I like what was proposed earlier here:

- write a text explaining the issue
- add a note, more objectively, about phpng
- remove from www homepage, such things have nothing to do there.
- keep the URL with the new text

Cheers,
-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org

--
PHP Webmaster List Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to