From: "Georg Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Wednesday, 6. February 2002 02:26, James Cox wrote: > > > As far as the actual license goes, GPL is probably not where we want to be > > - it's something i personally shy away from due to it's restrictiveness. > > There are many other open source documentation licenses, and we should > > probably be looking at them. > > > > +2 > > Anybody else?! > > Where is the problem to change license to OPL or OPL related license? > Currently the license and politics of their holder(s) really doesn't improve > the Manual (and the spirit of Open Source).
Have you a problem? The copyright holders, if you mean that, doesn´t have any problems to change the licence. I need only a acknowledgemt from editors (including editors of other languages than English) and authors. -Egon
