At 16.11 05/05/02 +0100, James Cox wrote: >Guys, would there be uproar if we split up the cvs avail for each language? >ie, i'm not going to need to be touching hebrew, japanese style languages -- >given i have no idea how to type them, etc :) > >Also, splitting up the avail file will mean it should become easier to see >who's translating what; as well as removing the potential for mistakes.
I usually make changes to /it and /en, but sometimes I commit to all other languages. Like I did after banana-split to correct some errors in the various reference.xml files. And when I spot problems in the build processes of other languages. However, IMHO, you can split the avail files, but ask everybody if he want commit rights just to thier own translation + /en or not. Maybe this is not feasible. Or work out something different like having some ppl with access to the whole manual (including those interested in checking if all the manuals are building correctly) and ppl who are just translating to a specified language and thus dont need access to other languages. Ciao, Simone.
