On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 09:16, Jordi Boggiano <j.boggi...@seld.be> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Philip Olson <phi...@roshambo.org> wrote: >> (d) Write "Future PHP Release" or similar until we know (seems okay) >> >> I lean towards (d) for most cases. Thoughts? > > I'd also prefer D since it is the easiest to search & replace once > decisions are made. I think however that instead of Future PHP > Release, which sounds really vague and timeless, I'd suggest deciding > upon a name that everyone uses to talk about the next php, the obvious > PHP.Next seems to be almost a standard now, we could make it more > phpey with \PHP::Next or something, but I don't mind too much either > way. This is still a bit vague and timeless, but it sounds cooler and > it sounds like it's coming next, not "once upon a time in the future".
Why not just call it trunk? -- Daniel Egeberg
