Oleksandr, thank you for the report. Please confirm, what does *CPU report under the src64 version on the Win10/Windows Subsystem? If it is emu then it is running the emulated version of the 64-bit version, which is good but not optimal for performance
I have a 32-bit windows 10 machine and the Windows Subsystem for Linux was not available on 32-bit as of a few months ago, which is one of the reasons I started working on the win-x86-64 port. If the native, assembly, version of PicoLisp 64 runs under Win10/x64 then that would be great. I will still continue to work on my port as I would like to support those without access to win10 (myself included). On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Oleksandr Nikitin <oleksa...@tvori.info> wrote: > Hi Rick, Thursten > > just FYI, both 32 and 64-bit PicoLisp compiles and runs pretty much > transparently on the new "Windows Subsystem for Linux". > > Haven't tried using database yet, though. > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Rick Hanson <cryptor...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Thorsten wrote: >> > Hi List, >> >> Hi, Thorsten ! >> >> > I just discovered a nice article by Joe Bogner about FLINUX as an >> > alternative was to run PicoLisp under Windows >> > (http://picolisp.com/wiki/? flinuxpicolisp). >> > >> > I tried it out, and succeded to a certain point but not further. >> > >> > When installing necessary tools like wget, make etc. I often hit the >> > "could not change the root directory (No such file or directory)" >> > error, but it appeared after the last installation step, and after >> > an C-c installation appeared successful. >> > >> > But when trying to compile the 64bit version, Java is missing, and >> > when I try to install it, I get the above error in the middle of the >> > installation process that thus cannot finish. >> > >> > There is some info about this >> > (https://github.com/wishstudio/flinux/issues/63), but I could not >> > really find a solution. Did somebody on the list succeed with the >> > Flinux install of the 64bit version on Windows? >> >> I'm not aware. It looks as if his article >> >> http://picolisp.com/wiki/?flinuxpicolisp >> >> was only meant for 32-bit pil builds. >> >> On the other hand and on the topic of Windows 64-bit pil builds, Joe >> is currently working on and very close to a solution based on midipix. >> >> http://www.midipix.org/#sec-midipix >> >> He has been working closely with the midipix author for many weeks now >> (back and forth on IRC) to iron out particular problems with getting >> pil ported there. >> >> There is not much in the way of documentation yet, but Joe has >> cataloged some pil patches related to the midipix build here: >> >> https://github.com/joebo/picoLisp-win-x86-64 >> >> (and there might be more he has not pushed yet; not entirely sure.) >> >> At any rate, when we see Joe (joebo) on #picolisp let's remind >> ourselves to ask him to update us about it here on the ML. >> >> > Any hints would be welcome. >> > Cheers >> > Thorsten >> >> Best, --Rick >> -- >> UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe >> > > > > -- > With best wishes, Oleksandr Nikitin > > skype: wizzard0 >
