Hi Thorsten, > I won't be able to participate during the whole meeting, maybe just half an > hour, and I already was in the first meeting about the topic.
No problem, as you know most of the issues. > Would it be possible to use Picolisp as "super fat client" by installing > the server app on the client side too and just let the databases > synchronize? It depends on what constitutes the client. > So you can actually allow the user to insert and execute code , because > it's done on his client, and not on the server, but the client & server > databases synchronize and the generated html is available on the server? In fact, this is exactly what I do in two production applications. The client is PilBox, and it oqerates on a clone of the database (offline and online), which is synchronized in the background whenever PilBox detects that it is online. > Not sure if that is a valid idea ;-) So it is indeed valid :) I could demonstrate the existing systems in one of the next PilCons, ideally when you have time again. I already showed them in one of the first PilCons, but only briefly, and they cover some interesting concepts anyway. ☺/ A!ex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
