Martin Stjernholm,  Roxen IS @ Pike  developers forum wrote:
>> hmm, i actually think they clutter up the gitk view more than a branch,
>> but then, gitk only shows the latest stash, not all of them.

>The problem is that all those "bogus" branches are shown for every
>commit back to the beginning - it gets difficult to see which "real"
>branches a commit far back is on.

gitk 0.5 0.6 7.0 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.7

should solve that; just name the branches you want to see.
Another thing is, branches can be placed in a subdirectory;
e.g. mainbranches/7.0 is a valid branchname.  It allows you to
group main branches or tempbranches or both.
-- 
Sincerely,
           Stephen R. van den Berg.

"People who think they know everything are annoying to those of us who do."
        • ... Peter Bortas @ Pike developers forum
  • Re:... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
    • ... Martin Bähr
      • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
        • ... Martin Baehr
          • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
            • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
      • ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
        • ... Martin Baehr
          • ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
            • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
        • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
          • ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
            • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
            • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
              • ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
              • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
              • ... Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum
    • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
      • ... Peter Bortas @ Pike developers forum
        • ... Stephen R. van den Berg

Reply via email to