Peter Bortas @ Pike developers forum wrote:
>>Please keep in mind that many, if not all, of those initially missing
>>features are things which never existed before in any VCS. So it's not
>>really fair to compare that to e.g. SVN where some of those features are
>>simply not viable.
>Maturity does not have a lot to do with number of features. I has a
>lot to do with having those features for a long time to the point
>where no new features are added and stability has been achived. CVS is
>mature and stable. SVN is mature and fairly stable. git is not mature
>and not stable.
I agree. But, as explained in another post, the parts of git that deal
with actually taking source-tree snapshots and storing them in the
repository are already mature and stable. The rest (the user interface)
is not (the higher level you go, the more unstable it is).
--
Sincerely,
Stephen R. van den Berg.
How many weeks are there in a lightyear?
