>Martin Stjernholm, Roxen IS @ Pike developers forum wrote: >>> Same question. More mature in which way? Git is maturing at an amazing >>> rate (codebase wise), most open source projects either start with git or >>> move from CVS or SVN to git these days. > >>But it is as you say: It is maturing very fast, hence it's not mature >>yet. I found several new and semi-essential features just by moving >>from the latest Ubuntu package to the latest upstream release. > >Please keep in mind that many, if not all, of those initially missing >features are things which never existed before in any VCS. So it's not >really fair to compare that to e.g. SVN where some of those features are >simply not viable.
Maturity does not have a lot to do with number of features. I has a lot to do with having those features for a long time to the point where no new features are added and stability has been achived. CVS is mature and stable. SVN is mature and fairly stable. git is not mature and not stable.
