On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Greg Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > We already have an Ant build, which is actually why I'm asking the question. > Our SVN repository is laid out in such a way that our Ant script can easily > build from it. In other words, it is optimized for Pivot *developers*. Our > source artifact is laid out such that it is easily browsable by Pivot > *users*, who may be interested in looking at the source, but not necessarily > building it (for example, I have often looked at the source code for the JDK, > but I have never attempted to build it). We see these as two very distinct > use cases, so we have structured our release artifacts accordingly.
This is not a problem. Just note that The ASF releases Source. We're Open Source after al :) >>There is one thing to take into consideration: source jars also need >>to be signed an contain the incubator disclaimer. > > You are referring to the PGP signature, as opposed to Java code signing, > correct? Yes. Java code signing is not a requirement for releasing within the ASF (though it may be for a particular project). Martijn
