>> We already have an Ant build, which is actually why I'm asking the question. >> Our SVN repository is laid out in such a way that our Ant script can easily >> build from it. In other words, it is optimized for Pivot *developers*. Our >> source artifact is laid out such that it is easily browsable by Pivot >> *users*, who may be interested in looking at the source, but not necessarily >> building it (for example, I have often looked at the source code for the >> JDK, but I have never attempted to build it). We see these as two very >> distinct use cases, so we have structured our release artifacts accordingly. > >This is not a problem. Just note that The ASF releases Source. We're >Open Source after al :)
Of course. :-) Glad to hear that our current approach is OK, because I do think that source-code savvy users (not developers) will find it easier to navigate.
