I think you should make a distinction between a source jar, and the distribution. The source jar is what people attach in their IDE's, the source distribution is used to build.
The source jar should be named: pivot-1.1-sources.jar (artifactId-version-classifier.jar) If you make this distinction: a sources jar for inclusion in IDE's and a source distribution for building, extending etc. it would make it easy for your users, and especially for Maven users that decide to include pivot in their poms. Martijn On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Greg Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >>The Source Release >>Tarball MUST be buildable through provided instructions. > > OK. Does the output of this build need to be equivalent to the output of the > Eclipse or Ant build from SVN, or does it simply need to build? For example, > I could provide a basic shell script that compiles all the source into class > files but doesn't package them into their associated JARs, etc. > Alternatively, I could write a simple Ant script to do the same. Some > developers may actually prefer this, as it would allow them to package the > code as they see fit (perhaps removing classes that they don't use). > > -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
