On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 05:38:58PM -0700, Dan Price wrote: > Cool. This is looking very good. When you post your webrev, I'll > do a pass through the code in more depth. > > I thought I wrote these down, but discovered that I didn't. A few > more questions: How do you handle: > > - tests in the baseline but which didn't run
Not sure what you mean here -- didn't run because they error'd? > - tests which ran but aren't in the baseline Currently not handled. Though we could easily print something near the test such as: foo.py Testcase pass *** Testcase is not in the baseline; please regenerate *** Or something like that. > And, would it be possible to have a command line arg for providing a > path to an alternate baseline? At the moment there is two baseline files (cli, and api), which in retrospect doesn't make that much sense. So I can merge those into one file then provide a command line option (-b, or something) that allows the user to specify a baseline. New webrev (with your previous suggestions) is posted here: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~bhall/bug-2627-1/ Thanks, Brad _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
