* Danek Duvall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-20 18:09]: > On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 11:04:48AM -0700, Stephen Hahn wrote: > > > Agree. I suggest pkg.misc as a better home than client.py, until we > > straighten out where different policies might go... > > Looks like there's already some ssl stuff in the Image class, and after > talking with K, these two functions would make sense to go there. > > > Instead of spreading out the if blocks for certificate checks into > > each command, I wonder if we should group the "switch" at 1730 into > > operations that contact authorities and those that don't, and only > > check for the former? > > The problem is for things like info and contents, which decide within the > methods that handle those operations whether they'll be contacting the > server or not (info -r, for example).
Good points. Thanks Stephen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/ _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
