Great. I've incorporated the other comments into a new webrev available here:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~johansen/webrev-2951-2/ This also fixes an unrelated test suite failure that magically occurred while re-testing this change. -j On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 11:23:59AM -0700, Danek Duvall wrote: > On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 11:18:41AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > This is what stopped me from doing this before. However, if it would > > look cleaner and we can live with info and search always performing this > > check, I could group them this way. The only downside is that for these > > routines that sometimes go local instead of remote, we'll perform the > > check anyway. > > > > Thoughts? > > I'd say that keeping it the way it is for now is fine, and we can > consolidate the checks once you're able to address Darren's concerns about > doing the checks closer to the actual ssl transport usage. > > Danek > _______________________________________________ > pkg-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
