Rich Burridge wrote: > Danek Duvall wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:15:09AM -0700, Rich Burridge wrote: >> >> >>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~richb/pkg-9683-v1/ >>> >> >> Looks fine, but a few questions ... >> >> Is there a specific reason to have separate 64-bit packages, or is this >> only because the 1.6 packages are like this?
I suspect it's because 1.6 does it that way. From looking at the 1.6 DLJ bundles, it seems that that 64 bit stuff is a separate overlay, so I guess that led to it being its own package. cheers, dalibor topic -- ******************************************************************* Dalibor Topic Tel: (+49 40) 23 646 738 Java F/OSS Ambassador AIM: robiladonaim Sun Microsystems GmbH Mobile: (+49 177) 2664 192 Nagelsweg 55 http://openjdk.java.net D-20097 Hamburg mailto:[email protected] Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten Amtsgericht München: HRB 161028 Geschäftsführer: Thomas Schröder, Wolfgang Engels, Wolf Frenkel Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Häring _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
