Is there a specific reason to have separate 64-bit packages, or is this only because the 1.6 packages are like this?
In the past with Java 6 we also had the concern with the size of the 64-bit runtime package. Before LZMA, it would have added over 6MB to the Live CD and roughly 22MB on an image.
Why "openjdk" instead of "jdk"? Will there be a non-"open" jdk at some point and we need to distinguish them?
It's my understanding that there may indeed be a non-open version of this in the future, hence the name.
Why "manual-japan" instead of "manual-ja" or "manual-japanese"? Seems like a compromise that's neither horse nor fish. :)
I'm alright with manual-ja since we've discussed using the locale name there. Or maybe manual/ja? :-) _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
