On 06/24/11 02:10 PM, Danek Duvall wrote:
[snip]
I'll agree that we have a bunch of examples that are pretty silly. 3,
13-20, maybe the set-publisher ones. And 22 would be better with a more
realistic set of package names.
If you don't think that there's any interesting output to be shown here,
then I'd just not put in any examples. We don't have to demonstrate every
single aspect of every single subcommand.
Great, I'll pull them out then. :)
Brock
Danek
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
