>>>>> Browser: We do not recommend one at the moment >>>> >>>> for browser I would turn the recommendation the other way: let's >>>> explicitly >>>> recommend to not use any of the Qt browsers. >>> >>> I've heard people using e.g. QupZilla as their daily browser and not being >>> unhappy with it. I don't think it's at a state where I'd explicitly >>> recommend it, but it's not so bad that I'd recommend _against_ it. >> >> And from a security perspective? > Are there any known security flaws with Qt browsers ? I just tried out > QupZilla and I really like it. The interface is neat and it's not > taking much memory either. I'm really enjoying it to be honest. But > what I don't know is, how secure it is ? > > I'm just being curious here. I'm definitely tilting towards wanting to > use QupZilla on a daily basis, and would be glad to receive any > heads-ups before I take the plunge :-)
There are gazillion security flaws if they use the unmaintained QtWebKit. QupZilla >= 2.0 on the other hand uses QtWebEngine. Security fixes might need some time to trickle down from Chromium to your local copy of QtWebEngine though. Cheers, Heiko _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel