On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 04:56:01PM -0400, Eric Laberge wrote: > If I recall, LGPL was chosen to allow 3rd companies to write custom or > proprietary plugins for Plex86, or to do internal device/driver > development. It is one of the strength of open emulation/virtualisation. > > By forcing these people to comply with the GPL, which wouldn't allow > linking these proprietary plugins, we'd loose a major market share which > could be quite helpful for new development.
But what's more useful: Some GPL'd code we can use or those non-free modules? Jeroen Dekkers -- Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org IRC: jeroen@openprojects
