instead of an img why not use '-' or '>' for this. there text so the size is minimal and you can stack them if ceeded (1st level could be '>' next '>>' and then '>>>' and so on) i just dont know how this would be parsed out?
>On Thu, Dec 06, 2001, Bill Janssen wrote: >> > BTW: What's about the idea to include some images in the plucker prc >> > and add a new function code to display them? For example we can >> > include an bullet picture and use this for rendering the ordered list >> > items (no more problems with other Charsets) or an Broken Picture >> >> Yes, I was planning to do this. > >You better have some very good arguments for adding this to the *viewer* >For me it seems to be a task better handled by the parser. How many >different bullets did you intend to add to the viewer? You can have >several levels in a list... > >The "broken picture" image doesn't add anything, but bloat... > >/Mike
