Robert O'Connor wrote: > > However, I would much prefer to see it as a <a > href="javascript:history.back()"> That is the W3C standard way for a > back hyperlink. The pods:// protocol is not any standard, it is > something proprietary and closed. It may be better for Plucker to > encourage the standards instead of the proprietary things, especially > from companies that may fold up shop soon. >
Well the parser(s) could support both the JavaScript and the "pods://" syntax. The point is that the correct function codes (and/or arguments) should be inserted in the text stream. Regards -Laurens _______________________________________________ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
