David,
On the most part, retaining the spec 100% is great. But in this case a few
of the sites (or more) were made for Avantgo, we can't deny that. Providing
a little 'extra' support for their links would help us see the sites more as
intended.
I'm sure someone could browse their developer section to get an idea what
tags would be beneficial/resonable to emulate. Because as much as you
expect 100% html, you just not gonna get it 100% of the time. Adding little
tricks like this and little helpers ('blue' = '#0000FF') to smooth over not
100% w3c standard will come a long way to making plucker easier to use
(overall). Even if that's not one of the main project goals. And overall
it should be within acceptable limits, time and effort wise.
--Wes (the lurker?!?)
----- Original Message -----
From: "David A. Desrosiers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: Back/foward/home function code
>
> > This way a parser can support AvantGo pods:// URLs. For instance the
link
> > <a href="pods://avantgo/back"> instructs Avantgo to go one page back in
> > its history. It would be nice if the Viewer supported this as well.
There
> > are some AvantGo sites that use these links. (The Onion for example.)
>
> Show me where in the HTML spec, pods:// appears as a valid protocol.
>
>
> d.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> plucker-dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
>
_______________________________________________
plucker-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
