The reason for the poor Atom power consumption is because the chipset
is a desktop chipset.

Atom CPU average power is sub-3W but the north bridge alone (ICH)
consumes something like 15W. Until Intel comes out with an
Atom-specific ICH, power consumption will be less than impressive.

Almost all CPU's even the Pentium-III consume very little power under
"normal" use e.g. word processing, web browsing, due to the use of
halt states. And that's even when there's no underclocking, a regular
P-III consumes less than 0.5W when sleeping.


On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 9:01 AM, andrelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looking at the power usage of the Atom, An eye opener and impressive...
>
> Is my 3+ year old Athlon64. Using kill-a-watt, my total consumption
> for Athlon64 3000, 320Gb SATA HDD, 300Watt Power supply, DVD writer,
> AGP external video card, and 1Gb memory:
>
> Idle - 50watts
> Peak - 80watts
>
> From the review, Atom power peaks at anywhere from 66-72watts and idle
> 49-55watts.
>
> Hey, AMD, repackage athlon64 as a competitor to the Atom... and named
> it Retro. :)


-- 
Orlando Andico
+63.2.976.8659 | +63.920.903.0335
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

Reply via email to