On 18 Aug 01 at 15:20, Federico Sevilla III wrote:
> This was not Mary Christie's point. She didn't need per-user IP addresses.
> I think she had her IP address allocation screwed on right. She allocated
> an IP address per dial-up, which sounds sound. What she wanted to know was
> whether the server could be 192.168.0.1 and the dial-ups, 192.168.1.x.
>
> I'm not sure this can be done, but I haven't tried. On alternative would
> probably be to create an alias for eth0 (or maybe a dummy-type network
> interface) using the ip address 192.168.1.1. Then let each dial-up client
> know 192.168.1.1 as the server side. Then set up routing so that
> 192.168.0.x can talk to 192.168.1.x via the dial-up server. :)
Depends...are you referring to the same subnet (mask 255.255.0.0) or a
different subnet? I guess if it's on the same subnet, it will work. If it's
not, then you have to enable routing between the 2 addresses.
_
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
