On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Louie Miranda wrote: > > > Thats your point of view, I have mine. > > > And i respect yours, so respect mine. > > > > I'm sorry but i totally disagree. This is not something which one can > > argue one's way past. Telnet over ssl as a solution to network security > > is so much more inferior to SSH, and in fact, does not even merit one's > > curiosity and time to explore. > > Btw, i never point out that telnet over ssl is inferior or even a clone and > i never said a solution for network security.. which you are bragging about. > And i dont have a problem with that. > > Opinion mo yan. (w/c part?: respecting one's view on a certain field. :) >
I'm sorry if you think that my comment are directed towards you. These are not my opinions, these are facts that countless of other security experts on the net will back up. What I say about this telnet vs. ssh issue is not actually targetting your opinion or preference - which i really don't care about. Neither do i care how the discussion got started. When the question is about the use of telnet and ssh - It is making clear to everyone else reading this discussion what the accepted best practices for network security are - and that is the use of ssh for remote shell sessions. -- Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug . Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
