Good Day Everyone,

I have recently been able to install debian woody using a non-standard installer which supports varius RAID device drivers during installation. The Hardware RAID controller I used is the HighPoint RocketRaid Parallel ATA 133 controller, which has 4 channels -- good for up to 4 ATA 133 hard disks.

It stated out good, but then I had a certain problem regarding the performance of the RAID 1 implementation on this particular RAID controller.

It took around 45 minutes to write the inode structure of an ext3 filesystem for a pair of 80 gb hard drives... And that's not just it -- it takes me close to 3 hours to download and install the packages for the base debian system from CDROM. Yes, from CDROM.

Aside from that, I feel that the RAID controller (connected via PCI) is hogging up the PCI bandwidth of the server, which in turn competes with the network device (NIC). I might be wrong, but my gut feeling and comsci subject on computer architecture tells me to think that way.

Does anybody have the same performance frustrations with hardware RAID? I mean, compared to sftware RAID using your friendly neighborhood standard high performance IDE controller, I get really good performance from a P4 2.8 Ghz based 1GB RAM powered server. Software RAID 1 was so much better than hardware based RAID 1, that I'm not even considering it (hardware RAID) anymore unless it comes with hotswapping capabilities, and a separate rackmountable casing.

Any remedies? Anything will be most appreciated.

TIA

--
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
[email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph
Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph
.
To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug
.
Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to
http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie

Reply via email to