Folks, I have a great transaction capture on Wireshark,
when I went to save it I get a bitch screen that says
You don't have permission to create or write to the file:
test.pcapng

Funny thing is I have been doing these captures now
for several days, but this was the best one. I just am
not sure why this is happening. I started Wireshark with
elevated access, and I have not stopped it since I saved
the last file. Never seen this before. I have seen it when
something did not get started with a needed permission
level but never seen something change without shutting
it down and restarting.


On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 10:58 AM Chuck Hast <wch...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have a batch of Chinese security cameras, one day I was
> sniffing my LAN and saw these packets that should not have
> been there, started tracing them down and they were coming
> from the cameras, they were trying to connect to 4 chinese
> web sites and AWS.  The now are on an island network which
> routes to nowhere and the only other thing on there is the port
> that sends all of the camera data to ZoneMinder. Crazy cameras
> were trying to call home constantly. I cleaned some of it up by
> giving them all static IP's and getting rid of any DNS info. Some
> of them still try  but a lot less.
>
> That was before I started seeing comments on line about the
> cameras doing the "call  home" thing.
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 11:56 PM Tomas Kuchta <tomas.kuchta.li...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Like with all other "smart things" you are the product, that thing is just
>> the bait to connect to you .... I had the same thing with environment
>> sensors this summer. I returned them and got bunch of half price 433MHz
>> sensors + SDR to receive their signals.
>>
>> There are still 433MHz remote controlled relays + $5-$10 transmitters to
>> turn them on/off if you do not want to use SBC or Arduino.
>>
>> What sorry state of affairs, these things could be supper useful, only if
>> the would hot call home.
>>
>> -T
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2022, 00:00 Chuck Hast <wch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Well folks here is the capture. This is when the device does the
>> > time change.
>> >
>> -------------------------SoF----------------------------------------------
>> > No.     Time    Source  Destination     Protocol        Length  Info
>> > 1416    6995.707153289  192.168.7.45    192.168.7.1     DNS     129
>> > Standard query 0x011d A my.radiothermostat.com
>> > 1417    6995.743011679  192.168.7.1     192.168.7.45    DNS     283
>> > Standard query response 0x011d A my.radiothermostat.com CNAME
>> > rtcoa-load-balancer.energyhub.net CNAME
>> > prod-ext-2-397343966.us-east-1.elb.amazonaws.com A 3.214.34.120 A
>> > 54.209.187.172 A 107.21.255.187
>> > 1418    6995.744228645  192.168.7.45    107.21.255.187  TCP     125
>> > 35222 → 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=2896 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=1 SACK_PERM=1
>> > TSval=23065200 TSecr=0
>> > 1419    6995.795424653  107.21.255.187  192.168.7.45    TCP     121
>>  80
>> > → 35222 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=26847 Len=0 MSS=1460 SACK_PERM=1
>> > TSval=1316753308 TSecr=23065200 WS=256
>> > 1420    6995.796759302  192.168.7.45    107.21.255.187  TCP     113
>> > 35222 → 80 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=2896 Len=0 TSval=23065200
>> TSecr=1316753308
>> > 1421    6995.797280360  192.168.7.45    107.21.255.187  TCP     204
>> > 35222 → 80 [PSH, ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=2896 Len=91 TSval=23065200
>> > TSecr=1316753308 [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU]
>> > 1422    6995.851194008  107.21.255.187  192.168.7.45    TCP     113
>>  80
>> > → 35222 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=92 Win=26880 Len=0 TSval=1316753363
>> TSecr=23065200
>> > 1423    6995.853333530  192.168.7.45    107.21.255.187  HTTP    579
>> > POST /filtrete/rest/rtcoa HTTP/1.1
>> > 1424    6995.905205495  107.21.255.187  192.168.7.45    TCP     113
>>  80
>> > → 35222 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=558 Win=28160 Len=0 TSval=1316753417
>> TSecr=23065300
>> > 1425    6995.912865908  107.21.255.187  192.168.7.45    HTTP    585
>> > HTTP/1.1 200 200
>> > 1426    6995.935820827  192.168.7.45    107.21.255.187  TCP     113
>> > 35222 → 80 [FIN, PSH, ACK] Seq=558 Ack=473 Win=2424 Len=0 TSval=23065300
>> > TSecr=1316753424
>> > 1427    6995.986668924  107.21.255.187  192.168.7.45    TCP     113
>>  80
>> > → 35222 [FIN, ACK] Seq=473 Ack=559 Win=28160 Len=0 TSval=1316753499
>> > TSecr=23065300
>> >
>> >
>> ------------------------EoF-----------------------------------------------------
>> > It is during this transaction that the time change takes place.
>> > I never signed up for their cloud service. This took place betwen
>> > Sept when I turned off the A/C and Nov when I turned on the
>> > heat. Thermostat was on all of the time. And as far as I know it
>> > was talking to the local HA server.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 6:56 PM Chuck Hast <wch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I am going to start the logging I tested yesterday back up.
>> > > I had enabled packet sniffing streaming to a remote server
>> > > (Wireshark on another machine) so I had it running indeed
>> > > I thought I had saved that file but when I went to look at it
>> > > this a.m. somehow I sent it down the bit toilet... Ohh well it
>> > > is just bits, be a good exercise to get it going again. I need
>> > > to trace things every once in a while knowing how to get
>> > > the bit stream out of the router to wireshark can be very
>> > > handy (I am looking these chinese cameras that call home)
>> > >
>> > > Now if I can get the manufacturer to do more than respond
>> > > with scripted replies...
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 6:17 PM Ben Koenig <techkoe...@protonmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Whoops looks like I hit the wrong reply button and moved this off the
>> > >> PLUG list.
>> > >>
>> > >> In my experience time sync issues are generally always the result of
>> one
>> > >> of 3 different root causes. For embedded devices its often simpler
>> since
>> > >> you have no control over the software, it just does whatever it was
>> > coded
>> > >> to do.
>> > >>
>> > >> #1 is the CMOS battery. If the firmware isn't holding on to certain
>> > >> settings (such as battery failure) then the clock will revert.
>> Normally
>> > >> this sends you back to 1970 but I've seen more recent devices behave
>> > >> differently. In your case it looks like the time zone is not being
>> held
>> > >> properly.
>> > >> #2 is buggy software on the device that is resetting the time. Could
>> be
>> > a
>> > >> y2k22 style bug ( hi microsoft! ) or something else that it hit.
>> > >> #3 is the server. Since blocking the IP at the router prevents this
>> > issue
>> > >> then it might just be something stupid on their server end.
>> > >>
>> > >> IMO it's a combination of #2 and #3. This type of unexpected
>> behavior is
>> > >> not uncommon on E.T. devices since they *ALWAYS* phone home
>> regardless
>> > of
>> > >> whether or not you set up an account. It's entirely possible that it
>> > spent
>> > >> the last 2 years dialing home for your timezone but in the past few
>> > months
>> > >> the server gave a different response. If you had a history of all web
>> > >> traffic to those 3 addresses in the past year you could probably spot
>> > the
>> > >> change. Maybe they changed the default response to unregistered
>> devices.
>> > >>
>> > >> It would be interesting to log the actual web traffic and see if you
>> can
>> > >> spot the data being returned. If you logged all traffic for the past
>> > year
>> > >> then you could correlate the time you saw the change with any
>> changes in
>> > >> server responses.
>> > >>
>> > >> -Ben
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>> > >> On Wednesday, January 5th, 2022 at 2:50 PM, Chuck Hast <
>> > wch...@gmail.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> The interesting thing is that I have had this unit for over
>> > >> 2 years and it has never done this, it just started doing
>> > >> it when I turned on the heat. I had shut the HVAC system
>> > >> down in Sept because the weather did not warrant running
>> > >> the system. All I did was set the system to OFF on the
>> > >> thermostat. So it was all powered up. When I set it to HEAT
>> > >> I got this funny time change thing. I tested with the A/C, as
>> > >> we have had a nice warm autumn this year, and got the
>> > >> same thing. So something happened between Sept and
>> > >> Nov when I turned on the heat. The question is what? Did
>> > >> the thermostat get hacked somehow, I have tried to do a
>> > >> factory reset but that does not work either. And since these
>> > >> people will not talk on the phone, I am pretty much running
>> > >> out of patience.
>> > >>
>> > >> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 4:38 PM Ben Koenig <techkoe...@protonmail.com
>> >
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> You also want to look at the URL sent as well. Since no other ports
>> are
>> > >>> open it's unlikely to be using any non-HTTP protocols. However if
>> this
>> > is a
>> > >>> REST API of some sort then the addresses might be part of a load
>> > balancing
>> > >>> system and may be expecting data for authentication or other
>> > information
>> > >>> specific to your router. The address is just the server being asked
>> for
>> > >>> information, the full URL path is the question.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> What's probably happening is that your "unconfigured" device is
>> dialing
>> > >>> home to ask if it is associated with an account using a REST API.
>> When
>> > it
>> > >>> gets a no from the server, it loads default settings and probably
>> goes
>> > >>> through this check on a regular schedule. I see this a lot with
>> > >>> cloud-routers as well. Under the hood its openwrt and while they
>> > function
>> > >>> without the cloud account linked they tend to behave in unexpected
>> > ways.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> -Ben
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>> > >>> On Wednesday, January 5th, 2022 at 2:19 PM, Chuck Hast <
>> > wch...@gmail.com>
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> That is interesting, yesterday I tried all of them and
>> > >>> got no route, but doing as you did gave me what you
>> > >>> got. I have got to fire up Wireshark and get the sniffer
>> > >>> going on my router again and capture those packets
>> > >>> to see what is going on, I know that what I saw was
>> > >>> that the system was saying that there was no route
>> > >>> available. Let me get the port that was associated
>> > >>> with this connection attempts.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 3:53 PM Ben Koenig <
>> techkoe...@protonmail.com>
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> FWIW those are actually up and have ports 80/443 open for web
>> access
>> > >>>> according to a zenmap no-ping scan.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Although accessing them via a browser is a pain. They are using
>> > >>>> self-signed certs and appear to be part of their API infrastructure
>> > since
>> > >>>> simple requests via curl result in redirect http response codes so
>> the
>> > >>>> servers are up but it appears they want to limit traffic from most
>> > sources.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> It would be kind of odd if they are using HTTP calls to sync the
>> time.
>> > >>>> Either way since you mentioned that you don't want to use their
>> cloud
>> > >>>> system they are probably safe to block. If you bypass SSL cert
>> checks
>> > then
>> > >>>> 3.214.34.120 actually brings up a real website.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> -Ben
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> On Wednesday, January 5th, 2022 at 11:02 AM, Chuck Hast <
>> > >>>> wch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> > Going to tear into it. Sorry state of affairs when you cannot
>> > >>>> >
>> > >>>> > trust the devices in your own home...
>> > >>>> >
>> > >>>> > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 12:59 PM Russell Senior
>> > >>>> russ...@personaltelco.net
>> > >>>> >
>> > >>>> > wrote:
>> > >>>> >
>> > >>>> > > The FCC internal photos (if I have the right device) suggest it
>> > is a
>> > >>>> > >
>> > >>>> > > marvell SoC. The photos have a sticker over the chip, so I
>> can't
>> > >>>> identify
>> > >>>> > >
>> > >>>> > > it precisely. There is a largish 8-pin SOIC chip in one corner
>> > that
>> > >>>> looks
>> > >>>> > >
>> > >>>> > > like serial NOR flash. If you can get the part numbers of the
>> SoC
>> > >>>> and the
>> > >>>> > >
>> > >>>> > > flash, that would help. I don't see an obvious serial console
>> in
>> > the
>> > >>>> > >
>> > >>>> > > photos, but the photos are a bit blurry.
>> > >>>> > >
>> > >>>> > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022, 10:46 Chuck Hast wch...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > >>>> > >
>> > >>>> > > > The radio is a separate module you can plug two of them
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > in, a zigbee module and a WiFi module, there are some
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > other ones also. I have the Wifi module. I will see which
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > one of those it is. I will see how to remove the case from
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > the thermostat board and see what is in there beside the
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > screen.
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > I am going to start a capture again and see what the port
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > is, I thought I had saved the previous capture file but when
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > I went to open it, could not find it.
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > It is either checking different addresses until it finds some
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > thing alive or one of those addresses is being activated.
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > If I block the address in the router the time stays what I
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > have set it to.
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 9:34 PM Russell Senior <
>> > >>>> russ...@personaltelco.net
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > wrote:
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > Maybe this? FCC ID: QO8-WIFI-M-0210
>> > >>>> > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > https://fccid.io/QO8-WIFI-M-0210
>> > >>>> > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 7:16 PM Russell Senior <
>> > >>>> > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > russ...@personaltelco.net
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > wrote:
>> > >>>> > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > Those addresses are all in AWS address space, according
>> to
>> > >>>> whois. As
>> > >>>> > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > a
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > previous commenter suggested, it might just be NTP. Did
>> you
>> > >>>> notice
>> > >>>> > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > what port the communication was happening over?
>> > >>>> > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > Have you considered popping the case and seeing if there
>> is
>> > a
>> > >>>> serial
>> > >>>> > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > console port on their wifi module? It's reasonably
>> likely it
>> > >>>> is
>> > >>>> > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > running some ancient version of linux. Is there an
>> FCC-ID on
>> > >>>> the
>> > >>>> > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > case?
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 6:49 PM Chuck Hast
>> wch...@gmail.com
>> > >>>> wrote:
>> > >>>> > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > Well folks, I was able to get wireshark on the
>> thermostat.
>> > >>>> I found
>> > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > that it is trying to contact these addresses:
>> > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > 54.209.187.172
>> > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > 107.21.255.187
>> > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > 3.214.34.120
>> > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > Right now none are reachable. I am trying to figure out
>> > why
>> > >>>> this
>> > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > thermostat is trying to reach those addresses.
>> > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > When I do a whois, they come up as being hosted on
>> > Amazon...
>> > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > I wonder if one of them comes awake every so often and
>> the
>> > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > thermostat gets the connection and receives a TZ
>> change...
>> > >>>> So
>> > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > far I have not been able to catch it doing so.
>> > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > When I bought the unit I intentionally did NOT try to
>> use
>> > >>>> the
>> > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > cloud service, I have tried to get proper
>> communications
>> > >>>> with
>> > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > Radio Thermostat but so far only idiots... And they do
>> not
>> > >>>> have
>> > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > a published telephone number.
>> > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 4:53 PM Chuck Hast
>> > wch...@gmail.com
>> > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > More info, this was the reply I got from the
>> > manufacturer
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>>
>> -----------------------SoF------------------------------------------
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > Radio Thermostat radiothermos...@tstatsupport.com
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > 1:10 PM (3 hours ago)
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > to Info, me
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > Hi,
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > If you are sure you have a WiFi module in the
>> thermostat
>> > >>>> Model -
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > RTMV-01
>> > >>>> > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > Then check out the following to see and correct the
>> time
>> > >>>> zone so
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > the
>> > >>>> > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > thermostat will have the correct time:
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > How to change time zone
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > First go to the web portal via a browser *
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > https://my.radiothermostat.com/rtcoa/login.html
>> > >>>> > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > https://my.radiothermostat.com/rtcoa/login.html*
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > (Note you will need to use the desktop version of the
>> > web
>> > >>>> site)
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > Then log in and go to the person (then select
>> location)
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > select the location you want and click edit
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > Go to the pull down for time zone and select your
>> time
>> > >>>> zone
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > Then click save
>> > >>>> > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > >
>> > >>>>
>> > -----------------------------------EoF---------------------------------
>> > >>>> > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > This is exactly what I have tried to avoid, I never
>> > >>>> registered
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > the thermostat with their cloud. I have my personal
>> > >>>> reasons
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > for not wanting my devices on someone's cloud if I
>> can
>> > >>>> avoid
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > it. in this case that is exactly what I have tried to
>> > do.
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > Now meantime, since the thermostat IP is static, I
>> went
>> > >>>> into
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > the firewall and set up a rule to drop any packets
>> > to/from
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > the thermostat. No more time change, and I did that
>> well
>> > >>>> over
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > and hour ago. I can still control the device on my
>> LAN
>> > >>>> just
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > dropping whatever is trying to reach the thermostat.
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > This brings up the question, of who/what is it? I
>> never
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > registered the device with their cloud, indeed I
>> bought
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > it because it was one of the thermostats that did not
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > require you to use an outside network to access it,
>> (I
>> > am
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > looking at you Honeywell, Nest and all of the rest of
>> > the
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > cloud only based devices). Now to see if I can get
>> Wire
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > shark on a part of the network that can see that
>> device.
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > Suspend the rule and try to catch the packet session.
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 9:41 AM Chuck Hast
>> > >>>> wch...@gmail.com
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > >>>> > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > Sorry, should have, not there is not. But the
>> > >>>> interesting thing
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > is that as long as it cannot contact the network
>> there
>> > >>>> is no
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > time change. I think I am going to go into the
>> > firewall
>> > >>>> and
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > make it drop all packets to/from the device and see
>> > what
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > happens. If that takes care of it then maybe allow
>> it
>> > >>>> to talk
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > on the LAN but drop anything going to/from it on
>> the
>> > WAN
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > side. I would like to see what it is talking to. So
>> > far
>> > >>>> I have
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > not been able to catch it.
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 11:00 PM Erik Lane
>> > >>>> erikl...@gmail.com
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > >>>> > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > You don't mention this, but since it's always 2
>> > >>>> hours, is
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > there a
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > time
>> > >>>> > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > zone
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > setting in there that has gotten off? Maybe it's
>> > >>>> talking to a
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > NTP
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > server?
>> > >>>> > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 8:49 PM Chuck Hast
>> > >>>> wch...@gmail.com
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > >>>> > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > Folks,
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > Not sure where to take this but figured that I
>> > >>>> would get more
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > info here.
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > I have a RadioThermostat CT80. I have had it
>> now
>> > >>>> for several
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > years. As the summer wound down. I shut down
>> the
>> > >>>> A/C and
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > opened the windows in the house. Then in Nov I
>> > >>>> needed to fire
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > up the heating, all appeared to be well, but I
>> > >>>> noticed that
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > the
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > thermostat clock was 2 hours slow. I set it
>> and a
>> > >>>> while
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > later see that it has lost 2 hours again.
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > I have a home automation system. I checked the
>> > >>>> logs, and
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > contacted the author. He has a CT50 which has
>> > fewer
>> > >>>> bells
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > and whistles than mine but same unit. Anyhow he
>> > >>>> gave me
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > some guidance, in the end I shut down the HA
>> > system
>> > >>>> and it
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > still would drop the 2 hours, I powered the
>> > >>>> thermostat down
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > and removed the WiFi radio, powered it back
>> up, it
>> > >>>> ran about
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > 4 hours (about 3 hours longer) and never
>> dropped
>> > >>>> the 2 hours.
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > Normally it will go between 20 minutes and an
>> hour
>> > >>>> after I
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > have set it to the correct time, then drop
>> back to
>> > >>>> the
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > incorrect
>> > >>>> > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > time. So this appears to indicated that it is
>> > either
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > something
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > on the network that is doing the time change or
>> > >>>> something in
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > the WiFi radio.
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > I am trying to sniff the network and see if I
>> can
>> > >>>> catch any
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > weird packets. But this is one I have not done
>> > >>>> before.
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > My router is a Mikrotik 2011, and I have been
>> > >>>> trying to use
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > the tools on it to try to monitor the IP
>> address
>> > of
>> > >>>> the
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > thermo-
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > stat and try to see if it is talking to
>> something
>> > >>>> else. So
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > far
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > no joy.
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > I am wondering about getting wire shark in
>> there
>> > >>>> and trying
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > to filter those packets that way as I am not
>> > having
>> > >>>> much luck
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > with the Mikrotik tools
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > Any recommendations?
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > --------------------
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > Chuck Hast -- KP4DJT --
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > I can do all things through Christ which
>> > >>>> strengtheneth me.
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > Ph 4:13 KJV
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > Todo lo puedo en Cristo que me fortalece.
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > > > Fil 4:13 RVR1960
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > --
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > Chuck Hast -- KP4DJT --
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > I can do all things through Christ which
>> strengtheneth
>> > >>>> me.
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > Ph 4:13 KJV
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > Todo lo puedo en Cristo que me fortalece.
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > > Fil 4:13 RVR1960
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > --
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > Chuck Hast -- KP4DJT --
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > I can do all things through Christ which
>> strengtheneth
>> > me.
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > Ph 4:13 KJV
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > Todo lo puedo en Cristo que me fortalece.
>> > >>>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > > Fil 4:13 RVR1960
>> > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > --
>> > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > Chuck Hast -- KP4DJT --
>> > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth
>> me.
>> > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > Ph 4:13 KJV
>> > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > Todo lo puedo en Cristo que me fortalece.
>> > >>>> > > > > > >
>> > >>>> > > > > > > Fil 4:13 RVR1960
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > --
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > Chuck Hast -- KP4DJT --
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me.
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > Ph 4:13 KJV
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > Todo lo puedo en Cristo que me fortalece.
>> > >>>> > > >
>> > >>>> > > > Fil 4:13 RVR1960
>> > >>>> >
>> > >>>> > --
>> > >>>> >
>> > >>>> > Chuck Hast -- KP4DJT --
>> > >>>> >
>> > >>>> > I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me.
>> > >>>> >
>> > >>>> > Ph 4:13 KJV
>> > >>>> >
>> > >>>> > Todo lo puedo en Cristo que me fortalece.
>> > >>>> >
>> > >>>> > Fil 4:13 RVR1960
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> --
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Chuck Hast -- KP4DJT --
>> > >>> I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me.
>> > >>> Ph 4:13 KJV
>> > >>> Todo lo puedo en Cristo que me fortalece.
>> > >>> Fil 4:13 RVR1960
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >>
>> > >> Chuck Hast -- KP4DJT --
>> > >> I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me.
>> > >> Ph 4:13 KJV
>> > >> Todo lo puedo en Cristo que me fortalece.
>> > >> Fil 4:13 RVR1960
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > >
>> > > Chuck Hast  -- KP4DJT --
>> > > I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me.
>> > > Ph 4:13 KJV
>> > > Todo lo puedo en Cristo que me fortalece.
>> > > Fil 4:13 RVR1960
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Chuck Hast  -- KP4DJT --
>> > I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me.
>> > Ph 4:13 KJV
>> > Todo lo puedo en Cristo que me fortalece.
>> > Fil 4:13 RVR1960
>> >
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Chuck Hast  -- KP4DJT --
> I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me.
> Ph 4:13 KJV
> Todo lo puedo en Cristo que me fortalece.
> Fil 4:13 RVR1960
>
>

-- 

Chuck Hast  -- KP4DJT --
I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me.
Ph 4:13 KJV
Todo lo puedo en Cristo que me fortalece.
Fil 4:13 RVR1960

Reply via email to