bpa wrote: > Since nobody else has reported this issue - it looks to be local to your > system. > > > > I'm trying to judge your technical ability. > > Wireshark records all the bits on the network links and the user then > has to got up through the level (IP, TCP, HTTP) before you see what is > on the wire which will the the HTTP with various parameters and the > response to the HTTP. The HTTP request/response will be spread across > many IP packets so it require skill to find the right packet and display > the TCP conversation to which the packet belongs. > My guess, given your unfamiliarity with wireshark, it is too > technical/too hard to instruct remotely. > > Is privoxy still running on the system ? or it been stopped in its > entirety.
I agree it's probably a local issue and Privoxy looked a good candidate. I know broadly what Wireshark does but have not used it, I will have look and see if I can make some progress. Thanks for your help. Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------ pshepherd's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9779 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=109826 _______________________________________________ plugins mailing list plugins@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins
