gharris999;399002 Wrote: > > aubuti;398707 Wrote: > > For the future... how about player-specific settings for whether a > > player gets pushed to SN on suspend or just disconnects from the > > suspended SC without pushing to SN? A month ago I would not have > > imagined the demand for such a feature, but right now I have that > > demand in my own family. My wife mostly uses a Duet and hates futzing > > around with changing the music source between SC and SN, or doing WOL > > via the SBC. So a simple suspend without pushing to SN works for her. > > My son has an SB2 (IR remote only) in his room and really prefers > > suspend-to-SN because the SB2 is his clock. But if the server is up, > > he'd like it connected. > > > > The easiest way to implement this without having to work up an > elaborate player selection UI is just to provide an edit box on the > prefs where you'd put a "white list" of player macs...if there are > macs in the list, then only players in the list are "allowed" to be > pushed to SN. Sort of the compliment to the existing "Specific > players to restore" pull-back feature. > > Is that the correct sort of UI symmetry to use here? As opposed to a > "black list" of players to never push? Looks like release candidate 6 (version updated 20090303) has met my wishes. At first it wasn't behaving as expected because I had the MACs for the 2 players I wanted pushed to SN also listed in the "bring back" white list. Now I just have them listed once, in the white list to push players to SN. Real slick! Thanks.
-- aubuti ------------------------------------------------------------------------ aubuti's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2074 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=48521 _______________________________________________ plugins mailing list plugins@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins
