Hi Armin.
I agree that CVS is tedious. It's your choice, of course. If in the future
you'll find it useful, just let us know, and we can help with this.
I think we can find volunteers (we are!); I'm just worried of not replicating
too much work. I think it could be good to share code with other projects
(ka-map???) wherever possible.
About VM: you mean providing a complete VM for windows users?
All the best.
pc
At 22:53, gioved? 19 gennaio 2006 you presumably wrote:
> Paolo,
>
> if there will be more contributions in the future I will think again
> about using CVS. I tested it once and found it a bit tedious. It's not
> currently one of the most important things for me. I will have to remove
> some bugs and finalize some work, maybe once, with pm 2.0 ready, we
> could discuss it again.
>
> I have also quite a few ideas what I would like to bring into p.mapper,
> not all might be straightforward. And I don't know if there will be
> volunteers for it...
>
> BTW: I tested the functionality of the VMWare Player as virtual machine
> and it works quite well. One can easily deploy a full running Linux
> engine with all Mapserver libs and tools compiled. Just need then to
> install the VM Player software (Win and Linux available) and start the
> virtual machine, and everything works fine. At least for testing quite
> helpful and you do not need all the time another Linux machine, just a
> virtual one inside your current OS. Speed etc. is quite good. If I will
> have made some clean up of pmapper I could provide it with Mapserver on
> a Debian VM for download (but it's something like 600 MB).
>
> Armin
--
Paolo Cavallini
email+jabber: cavallini at faunalia.it
www.faunalia.it
Piazza Garibaldi 5 - 56025 Pontedera (PI), Italy Tel: (+39)348-3801953
