On 6/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Dominique Faure wrote: > > > On 6/15/07, Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Friday, June 15, 2007, 8:19:40 PM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > >> > >>> I wasn't planning on (:nositeheader:), leaving it > >>> tied to the (:nogroupheader:). That might argue in > >>> favor of Site.AllGroupHeader instead (and there's > >>> precedent with respect to Site.AllRecentChanges). > >>> It also increases the regularity of the list=normal > >>> parameter, excluding both GroupHeader and AllGroupHeader. > >> > >> Good. Site.AllGroupHeader gets my vote. > >> Sites using it already can just drop the recipe. > >> > > > > +1 for me too. > > I prefer 'Site.SiteHeader'. > > /C
For what it's worth, I found AllGroupHeader counterintuitive, and would also prefer Site.SiteHeader. Cheers, Dan _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
