On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:41:12PM -0700, H. Fox wrote:
> On 6/19/07, Martin Fick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >--- "H. Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Can conditional markup be put a site-wide header
> >> that achieves
> >>
> >>    Look for a page named GroupHeader in the
> >>    current group, if that exists we use it,
> >>    otherwise use "fallback" markup.
> 
> Or maybe
> 
>   (:if ! exists {$Group}.GroupHeader :)
>   (:include Site.DefaultGroupHeader :)
> 
> since {$Group}.GroupHeader is already included automatically.
> If that works, it means the "fallback" Proposal #1 comes "free" with
> Proposal #2, does it not?

This fails the (:nogroupheader:) aspect, since 
Site.DefaultGroupHeader can still end up being included 
even if a page has (:nogroupheader:) in it.

...unless you're suggesting that (:nogroupheader:) also
affects the (site-wide) page containing the conditional 
markup above.  But I'm guessing not, because you seem to have
a -1 vote for having both the sitewide and group header
controlled by the (:nogroupheader:) directive.

Pm

_______________________________________________
pmwiki-users mailing list
pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com
http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users

Reply via email to