Yes, correct! Thanks for your correction.
Finally, the good news
is that the combined work PoDoFo + Crypto++ can be seen as LGPL from the
point of view of the using application.
---
Ugo
Chirico
http://www.cryptware.com
blog:
http://www.ugochirico.com
linkedin:
http://www.linkedin.com/in/ugochirico
------------------------------
mobile:
+393351401266
skype:
ugochirico-es-na
------------------------------
Il 02-03-2013 13:01
Even Rouault ha scritto:
>> It has almost all features of OpenSSL and
it isn't under GPL.
>
> Not exactly. Quoting the site :
>
>
"""Crypto++ Library is copyrighted as a compilation and (as of version
5.6.2) licensed [1] under the Boost Software License 1.0, while the
individual files in the compilation are all public domain."""
>
> And
Boost Software Licence is a X/MIT one, which is OK, since the combined
work PoDoFo + Crypto++ can be seen as LGPL from the point of view of the
using application (if Crypto++ was GPL, this would be annoying since it
would made the combined work GPL, which might not be OK for some users)
Links:
------
[1] http://www.cryptopp.com/License.txt
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
_______________________________________________
Podofo-users mailing list
Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
