Sure, just send me your sourceforge username and i will give you svn
permissions. The signature stuff is also a very welcome addition.
Cheers
Dom
Am 05.03.2013 17:45 schrieb "Ugo Chirico" <ugo.chir...@cryptware.net>:
> Hi Dom.
> Yes, I'm able to port podofo to Crypto++.
> Also, I'm still have the patches for digital signature (PAdES compliant)
> that can be added.
>
> I think it will take a month, more or less, considering all other stuffs
> I'm working on now.
> I prefer the SVN account if you can
>
> let me know...
>
> Regards,
>
> Ugo Chirico
> http://www.cryptware.it
> blog: http://www.ugochirico.com
> linkedin:
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/**ugochirico<http://www.linkedin.com/in/ugochirico>
>
> Il 04/03/2013 20.14, Dominik Seichter ha scritto:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Thanks for discussing the license situation and bringing some light into
>> this!
>>
>> @Ugo: A port to Crypto++ would be a good idea! PoDoFo references
>> OpenSSL only from within PdfEncrypt.cpp, as far as I can see. Are you
>> able to do a port to Crypto++? Can you estimate how long that would
>> take you to do? I could give you an SVN account for that task or you
>> could submit patches - whatever you prefer.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Dom
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Ugo Chirico <ugo.chir...@cryptware.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, correct! Thanks for your correction.
>>>
>>> Finally, the good news is that the combined work PoDoFo + Crypto++ can be
>>> seen as LGPL from the point of view of the using application.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Ugo Chirico
>>> http://www.cryptware.com
>>> blog: http://www.ugochirico.com
>>> linkedin:
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/**ugochirico<http://www.linkedin.com/in/ugochirico>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> mobile: +393351401266
>>> skype: ugochirico-es-na
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Il 02-03-2013 13:01 Even Rouault ha scritto:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It has almost all features of OpenSSL and it isn't under GPL.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Not exactly. Quoting the site :
>>>
>>> """Crypto++ Library is copyrighted as a compilation and (as of version
>>> 5.6.2) licensed under the Boost Software License 1.0, while the
>>> individual
>>> files in the compilation are all public domain."""
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> And Boost Software Licence is a X/MIT one, which is OK, since the
>>> combined
>>> work PoDoFo + Crypto++ can be seen as LGPL from the point of view of the
>>> using application (if Crypto++ was GPL, this would be annoying since it
>>> would made the combined work GPL, which might not be OK for some users)
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>>> ------------------
>>> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>>> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>>> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_**d2d_feb<http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> Podofo-users mailing list
>>> Podofo-users@lists.**sourceforge.net<Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/**lists/listinfo/podofo-users<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users>
>>>
>>>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
_______________________________________________
Podofo-users mailing list
Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
