Hi Dom.
Yes, I'm able to port podofo to Crypto++.
Also, I'm still have the patches for digital signature (PAdES compliant) 
that can be added.

I think it will take a month, more or less, considering all other stuffs 
I'm working on now.
I prefer the SVN account if you can

let me know...

Regards,

Ugo Chirico
http://www.cryptware.it
blog: http://www.ugochirico.com
linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ugochirico
  

Il 04/03/2013 20.14, Dominik Seichter ha scritto:
> Hi guys,
>
> Thanks for discussing the license situation and bringing some light into this!
>
> @Ugo: A port to Crypto++ would be a good idea! PoDoFo references
> OpenSSL only from within PdfEncrypt.cpp, as far as I can see. Are you
> able to do a port to Crypto++? Can you estimate how long that would
> take you to do? I could give you an SVN account for that task or you
> could submit patches - whatever you prefer.
>
> Best regards,
>   Dom
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Ugo Chirico <ugo.chir...@cryptware.net> wrote:
>> Yes, correct! Thanks for your correction.
>>
>> Finally, the good news is that the combined work PoDoFo + Crypto++ can be
>> seen as LGPL from the point of view of the using application.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Ugo Chirico
>> http://www.cryptware.com
>> blog: http://www.ugochirico.com
>> linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ugochirico
>> ------------------------------
>> mobile: +393351401266
>> skype: ugochirico-es-na
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Il 02-03-2013 13:01 Even Rouault ha scritto:
>>
>>
>>
>>> It has almost all features of OpenSSL and it isn't under GPL.
>>
>>
>> Not exactly. Quoting the site :
>>
>> """Crypto++ Library is copyrighted as a compilation and (as of version
>> 5.6.2) licensed under the Boost Software License 1.0, while the individual
>> files in the compilation are all public domain."""
>>
>>
>>
>> And Boost Software Licence is a X/MIT one, which is OK, since the combined
>> work PoDoFo + Crypto++ can be seen as LGPL from the point of view of the
>> using application (if Crypto++ was GPL, this would be annoying since it
>> would made the combined work GPL, which might not be OK for some users)
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
>> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
>> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
>> _______________________________________________
>> Podofo-users mailing list
>> Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
>>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
_______________________________________________
Podofo-users mailing list
Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users

Reply via email to