sorry but that is a bill that "allowed" different practices NOT one that "disallowed" the tried and centuries old true methods. the choice was left to the grubbers as to how they accounted for assets. they had the same choice as your local government does. is your house valued on the tax rolls at "market" or at the realistic 60- 75% of market. play word games all you want but until you decide to deal in reality...... Hai die Mull....
On 9/27/08, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sep 27, 12:40 pm, "Mark Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > the companies were not required to change to the "newer methods" but > > did so because they could show an inflated worth. It is and was their > > sole responsibility. > > > Not true... > > It shows less "worth", and the "Rules" were changed by Sarbanes-Oxley, > and the Legislation that followed, as a matter of LAW. > > Your ignorance on the matter notwithstanding. > > > > -- Mark M. Kahle Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
