Some people look at Obama and see a Democrat candidate for President.
YOU see a "black man." How telling.

On Sep 29, 3:47 am, "mike532 [ Republicans for Obama ]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> he ses the GOP being kicked out of the oval office by a black man and
> it is driving him nuts !
>
> On Sep 28, 10:14 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > voxitar,
>
> > Simply your opinion. Some people furrow their brow when thinking,
> > maybe he had gas. You see what you wish to see, that's all.
>
> > Cool and calm can appear to be simply dull and stupid or monumentally
> > stoned, if that is what THEY wish to see.
>
> > On Sep 27, 4:24 pm, voxitar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > hollywood, my comments were meant to include the substantive parts of
> > > the debate....Obama looked like an angry school boy with his furrowed
> > > brow, always on defense....McCain was calm, cool and collected and his
> > > experience and knowledge of the issues put him far and away ahead of
> > > Obama.
>
> > > On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > voxitar,
>
> > > > Typical, appearances and biased perceptions over substance. How
> > > > something was over what was said.
>
> > > > On Sep 27, 10:34 am, voxitar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >> Obama looked like a student being schooled by the master.  McCain
> > > >> looked presidential, Obama just looked like whiner.
>
> > > >> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 5:16 AM, mike532 [ Republicans for Obama ]
>
> > > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > >> > Six Short Takes on Why Obama Came out Ahead in the Debate
>
> > > >> >http://www.alternet.org/election08/100565/
> > > >> > In the first head-to-head debate of the 2008 campaign, the financial
> > > >> > crisis dragged what the McCain camp had hoped would be fought in the
> > > >> > GOP nominee's comfort zone -- foreign policy and national security --
> > > >> > squarely into the realm of domestic policy.
> > > >> > Moderator Jim Lehrer made a smooth transition to the voters' top
> > > >> > concern in this election, saying that we were facing a potential
> > > >> > meltdown of the global economy, which was by definition a matter of
> > > >> > "national security."
>
> > > >> > What followed was a microcosm of the 2008 race: Barack Obama 
> > > >> > dominated
> > > >> > John McCain when the focus of the debate was on the domestic sphere
> > > >> > and a fast-deteriorating financial sector, but ceded an enormous
> > > >> > amount of political space to McCain on national security, accepting
> > > >> > much of the Arizona senator's overarching neoconservative narrative
> > > >> > that the United States is surrounded by mortal danger and evildoers
> > > >> > and has a moral duty to maintain our forces in Iraq and elsewhere in
> > > >> > order to defend the homeland.
>
> > > >> > McCain appeared twitchy and out of touch as the debate began with the
> > > >> > banking meltdown and the Bush-Paulson plan to reverse it. He blinked
> > > >> > rapidly and avoided eye contact with Obama, Lehrer and the audience 
> > > >> > as
> > > >> > Obama came out swinging against McCain for enabling the "root causes"
> > > >> > of the crisis to develop during decades in the Congress, including a
> > > >> > long stint on the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and
> > > >> > Transportation.
>
> > > >> > Obama articulately condemned what he called a "philosophy that says
> > > >> > that regulation is always bad," and blamed its pervasiveness for the
> > > >> > economic mess. McCain, moments before saying that we have the
> > > >> > "greatest workers in the world" (and that the United States is
> > > >> > simultaneously the "greatest importer" and "greatest exporter" in the
> > > >> > world), tried to shift blame from Wall Street to Main Street -- from
> > > >> > predatory lenders and fast-and-loose brokers to those who find
> > > >> > themselves with a home on the bubble today.
>
> > > >> > It's a losing strategy.
>
> > > >> > Obama, on the other hand, must be extremely confident that this
> > > >> > election will be decided on the economy, as he failed to challenge
> > > >> > McCain on his belligerent stance toward the rest of the world.
>
> > > >> > He conceded that the "surge has worked" -- it has not. He tried to go
> > > >> > toe to toe with John "Bomb, Bomb Iran" McCain on the evils of Iran. 
> > > >> > He
> > > >> > called Venezuela a "rogue state." He engaged in a bit of 
> > > >> > fearmongering
> > > >> > himself, saying that while he supports missile defense -- a 
> > > >> > boondoggle
> > > >> > if ever there was one -- the greatest threat we face is from suitcase
> > > >> > nukes.
>
> > > >> > As Obama agreed with so much of McCain's worldview, McCain's
> > > >> > discomfort disappeared, and he landed several good knocks on Obama. 
> > > >> > He
> > > >> > repeatedly called him "naive."
>
> > > >> > But, in the final analysis, a day after Washington Mutual went down 
> > > >> > in
> > > >> > flames, I doubt that it'll be enough to get McCain out of the hole in
> > > >> > which he finds himself.
>
> > > >> > Don Hazen:
>
> > > >> > If you were an Obama champion and wanted McCain to fall flat, you 
> > > >> > were
> > > >> > disappointed. McCain is a tough, pugnacious debater, and he tried to
> > > >> > control the talk time, going on and on. He's knowledgeable, and as we
> > > >> > know, he whipped all of the Republicans during the primaries. But the
> > > >> > big picture is that McCain probably had to do better since he is
> > > >> > behind on the momentum and had to beat Obama with his supposed
> > > >> > strength -- foreign affairs -- and there is a consensus among the
> > > >> > commentators that he didn't do that.
>
> > > >> > If you reflect more on the meta or emotional level, McCain spent most
> > > >> > of his time talking about the past and focused on Iraq -- making sure
> > > >> > everyone knew that we had to win. That was the most important point 
> > > >> > he
> > > >> > needed to make. But if this election is about change, then McCain
> > > >> > reinforced his role as part of the problem. For most of the public,
> > > >> > Iraq is past tense. Sixty percent think the economy is the key issue.
> > > >> > And in terms of bread and butter, the numbers that people are likely
> > > >> > to remember are not the $18 billion earmarks discussion, but rather
> > > >> > the fact that 95 percent of the population will get a tax cut with
> > > >> > Obama -- everyone who makes under $250,000. Meanwhile, the figure
> > > >> > associated with McCain is likely to be $300 billion in tax cuts for
> > > >> > corporations and the wealthy, while we have a huge deficit. Obama had
> > > >> > to make kitchen table points stick, and he seemed to achieve that,
> > > >> > repeating these points several times.
>
> > > >> > The pundits were also speculating that independent voters didn't like
> > > >> > McCain's condescension and repeating that Obama "doesn't get it." 
> > > >> > Here
> > > >> > McCain could be seen as the cranky older guy, sounding a little
> > > >> > insecure, while Obama didn't rise to the bait. In fact, Obama agreed
> > > >> > with McCain a number of times, suggesting that Obama was more capable
> > > >> > of working across the aisle.
>
> > > >> > 123Next page »- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to