really what was one of the very first things the west built in
Afganistan ?

On Sep 29, 10:51 am, jgg1000a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not according to AQ...   I will take their word over yours...
>
> On Sep 28, 3:11 am, "mike532 [ Republicans for Obama ]"
>
>
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Irag and afganistan are linked by oil not Alquda ! and Irag had
> > nothing to do with alquda orior to the bush invasion .
>
> > On Sep 27, 1:37 pm, jgg1000a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Obama thinks the fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan are not linked in
> > > fundamental ways...  He wants to believe that because AQ did not much
> > > of a presence in Iraq in 2001 that Iraq was not seen as the central
> > > battlefield by both the US and AQ...  IT WAS SEEN AS THE CENTRAL
> > > BATTLEFIELD BY BOTH...  In not understanding this fundamental fact,
> > > Obama's assumptions over the consequences of a pullout (either today
> > > or 2 years ago) are critically flawed and WRONG...
>
> > > It is about judgment Hollywood,,  Not understanding what the facts are
> > > IS OBAMA'S basic lack of judgment...
>
> > > On Sep 27, 1:27 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > voxitar,
>
> > > > Typical, appearances and biased perceptions over substance. How
> > > > something was over what was said.
>
> > > > On Sep 27, 10:34 am, voxitar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Obama looked like a student being schooled by the master.  McCain
> > > > > looked presidential, Obama just looked like whiner.
>
> > > > > On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 5:16 AM, mike532 [ Republicans for Obama ]
>
> > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Six Short Takes on Why Obama Came out Ahead in the Debate
>
> > > > > >http://www.alternet.org/election08/100565/
> > > > > > In the first head-to-head debate of the 2008 campaign, the financial
> > > > > > crisis dragged what the McCain camp had hoped would be fought in the
> > > > > > GOP nominee's comfort zone -- foreign policy and national security 
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > squarely into the realm of domestic policy.
> > > > > > Moderator Jim Lehrer made a smooth transition to the voters' top
> > > > > > concern in this election, saying that we were facing a potential
> > > > > > meltdown of the global economy, which was by definition a matter of
> > > > > > "national security."
>
> > > > > > What followed was a microcosm of the 2008 race: Barack Obama 
> > > > > > dominated
> > > > > > John McCain when the focus of the debate was on the domestic sphere
> > > > > > and a fast-deteriorating financial sector, but ceded an enormous
> > > > > > amount of political space to McCain on national security, accepting
> > > > > > much of the Arizona senator's overarching neoconservative narrative
> > > > > > that the United States is surrounded by mortal danger and evildoers
> > > > > > and has a moral duty to maintain our forces in Iraq and elsewhere in
> > > > > > order to defend the homeland.
>
> > > > > > McCain appeared twitchy and out of touch as the debate began with 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > banking meltdown and the Bush-Paulson plan to reverse it. He blinked
> > > > > > rapidly and avoided eye contact with Obama, Lehrer and the audience 
> > > > > > as
> > > > > > Obama came out swinging against McCain for enabling the "root 
> > > > > > causes"
> > > > > > of the crisis to develop during decades in the Congress, including a
> > > > > > long stint on the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and
> > > > > > Transportation.
>
> > > > > > Obama articulately condemned what he called a "philosophy that says
> > > > > > that regulation is always bad," and blamed its pervasiveness for the
> > > > > > economic mess. McCain, moments before saying that we have the
> > > > > > "greatest workers in the world" (and that the United States is
> > > > > > simultaneously the "greatest importer" and "greatest exporter" in 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > world), tried to shift blame from Wall Street to Main Street -- from
> > > > > > predatory lenders and fast-and-loose brokers to those who find
> > > > > > themselves with a home on the bubble today.
>
> > > > > > It's a losing strategy.
>
> > > > > > Obama, on the other hand, must be extremely confident that this
> > > > > > election will be decided on the economy, as he failed to challenge
> > > > > > McCain on his belligerent stance toward the rest of the world.
>
> > > > > > He conceded that the "surge has worked" -- it has not. He tried to 
> > > > > > go
> > > > > > toe to toe with John "Bomb, Bomb Iran" McCain on the evils of Iran. 
> > > > > > He
> > > > > > called Venezuela a "rogue state." He engaged in a bit of 
> > > > > > fearmongering
> > > > > > himself, saying that while he supports missile defense -- a 
> > > > > > boondoggle
> > > > > > if ever there was one -- the greatest threat we face is from 
> > > > > > suitcase
> > > > > > nukes.
>
> > > > > > As Obama agreed with so much of McCain's worldview, McCain's
> > > > > > discomfort disappeared, and he landed several good knocks on Obama. 
> > > > > > He
> > > > > > repeatedly called him "naive."
>
> > > > > > But, in the final analysis, a day after Washington Mutual went down 
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > flames, I doubt that it'll be enough to get McCain out of the hole 
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > which he finds himself.
>
> > > > > > Don Hazen:
>
> > > > > > If you were an Obama champion and wanted McCain to fall flat, you 
> > > > > > were
> > > > > > disappointed. McCain is a tough, pugnacious debater, and he tried to
> > > > > > control the talk time, going on and on. He's knowledgeable, and as 
> > > > > > we
> > > > > > know, he whipped all of the Republicans during the primaries. But 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > big picture is that McCain probably had to do better since he is
> > > > > > behind on the momentum and had to beat Obama with his supposed
> > > > > > strength -- foreign affairs -- and there is a consensus among the
> > > > > > commentators that he didn't do that.
>
> > > > > > If you reflect more on the meta or emotional level, McCain spent 
> > > > > > most
> > > > > > of his time talking about the past and focused on Iraq -- making 
> > > > > > sure
> > > > > > everyone knew that we had to win. That was the most important point 
> > > > > > he
> > > > > > needed to make. But if this election is about change, then McCain
> > > > > > reinforced his role as part of the problem. For most of the public,
> > > > > > Iraq is past tense. Sixty percent think the economy is the key 
> > > > > > issue.
> > > > > > And in terms of bread and butter, the numbers that people are likely
> > > > > > to remember are not the $18 billion earmarks discussion, but rather
> > > > > > the fact that 95 percent of the population will get a tax cut with
> > > > > > Obama -- everyone who makes under $250,000. Meanwhile, the figure
> > > > > > associated with McCain is likely to be $300 billion in tax cuts for
> > > > > > corporations and the wealthy, while we have a huge deficit. Obama 
> > > > > > had
> > > > > > to make kitchen table points stick, and he seemed to achieve that,
> > > > > > repeating these points several times.
>
> > > > > > The pundits were also speculating that independent voters didn't 
> > > > > > like
> > > > > > McCain's condescension and repeating that Obama "doesn't get it." 
> > > > > > Here
> > > > > > McCain could be seen as the cranky older guy, sounding a little
> > > > > > insecure, while Obama didn't rise to the bait. In fact, Obama agreed
> > > > > > with McCain a number of times, suggesting that Obama was more 
> > > > > > capable
> > > > > > of working across the aisle.
>
> > > > > > 123Next page »- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to