Gaar your a republicunt thats axiomatic 'I was simply SHOWING YOU the tactics those YOU support are taking in this Election. ' with regards to that comment Dont' you realise that Bush paid for the election in 2000 you don't honestly think the whole thing was legit do you? I was 15 at the time and still in school and it was even then. I mean I know Americans in general are stupid just as people in my unfortunate country (UK) are, but you dont have to perpetually act stupid.
On Oct 3, 3:45 am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gaar, > > Why in the fucking hell do you think I suggested you send your > evidence to the proper authorites? Are you a complete idiot? IF THEY > ARE DOING WHAT YOU CLAIM THEY ARE AND IT VIOLATES STATE OR FEDERAL > ELECTION LAWS BY ALL MEANS PROSECUTE THEM TO THE FULLEST EXTENT OF THE > LAW. > > Now, is that clear enough to get thru your thick skull??? What the > fuck is wrong with you anyway? > > On Oct 2, 6:18 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So you do or don't agree with their tactics? > > > On Oct 2, 4:14 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Gaar, > > > > What the fuck are you babbling about now? Hell, I advised you to turn > > > them in to the proper authorites for prosecution if they were breaking > > > the law. > > > THAT'S showing support? What fucking planet are you from? > > > > On Oct 2, 6:09 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Yeah... > > > > > I was simply SHOWING YOU the tactics those YOU support are taking in > > > > this Election. > > > > > Not surprising to me you would support such people. > > > > > Also not surprising you don't care to Learn about the things that you > > > > support. > > > > > On Oct 2, 4:01 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Gaar, > > > > > > Such is life. > > > > > > On Oct 2, 5:59 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > You seem to beleieve it hasn't already been done... > > > > > > > The wheels of Justice turn ever so slowly. > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 3:55 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Gaar, > > > > > > > > Why show me? I advised you to present your evidence to the proper > > > > > > > authorities. Am I the proper authority? Get on it lad, times a- > > > > > > > wasting, there are evil-doers to be exposed. > > > > > > > Jump on it, y vaya con Dios. > > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 5:29 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > >http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2008/10/ohio_vote_fraud.php > > > > > > > > > Early voting is taking place in Ohio. Through the end of the > > > > > > > > week, > > > > > > > > people can register and vote on the same day. The Ohio > > > > > > > > Secretary of > > > > > > > > State Jennifer Brunner argues that they are merely "casting > > > > > > > > their > > > > > > > > ballot" rather than "voting" so the fact that Ohio statute > > > > > > > > requires 30 > > > > > > > > days between registering and voting would not interfere. > > > > > > > > > So here is what is happening today. People are showing up to > > > > > > > > register > > > > > > > > and vote. There is no affirmative evidence that these people > > > > > > > > have not > > > > > > > > registered or voted somewhere else. There is no control. > > > > > > > > Normally in > > > > > > > > an election, partisan election monitors are allowed into polling > > > > > > > > places so that they can police each other. But not in two > > > > > > > > counties, > > > > > > > > Franklin and Montgomery, in Ohio. Brunner also issued an > > > > > > > > advisory > > > > > > > > opinion to counties saying that they are not required to allow > > > > > > > > election monitors. > > > > > > > > > Here you can see an election observer be turned away. > > > > > > > > > (Video at Link provided) Which I believe is empirical > > > > > > > > evidence, of > > > > > > > > the First Order. > > > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 3:19 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Gaar, > > > > > > > > > > Why wait? Turn your evidence in to the appropiate authorities > > > > > > > > > right > > > > > > > > > now. They can at least issue an emergency restraining order > > > > > > > > > and put a > > > > > > > > > stop to the practice right now. Go, run, hurry. Do your duty > > > > > > > > > as a > > > > > > > > > citizen. > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 4:39 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, I heard that this last night... > > > > > > > > > > > The bad thing is, there will not likely be a Court > > > > > > > > > > challenge to this > > > > > > > > > > until AFTER they have stolen the Election. > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 2:35 pm, Zebnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Democrats in Ohio are rounding up homeless people and > > > > > > > > > > > paying them to > > > > > > > > > > > register and vote for Obama. Pitiful and completely > > > > > > > > > > > illegal. Not that > > > > > > > > > > > it bothers Democrats to commit election fraud. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 2:03 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am starting to believe that the Liberals around here > > > > > > > > > > > > don't give a > > > > > > > > > > > > shit... > > > > > > > > > > > > > All they want is to get the Presidency and both Houses > > > > > > > > > > > > of Congress, no > > > > > > > > > > > > matter what. > > > > > > > > > > > > > And then we wonder how we get into the shit we do... > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 6:30 am, "Keith In Tampa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know if this helps or not, but to try and > > > > > > > > > > > > > clarify or to at least add > > > > > > > > > > > > > to the history of how this debacle started; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First, the "Fannie Mae" that was created in 1938 by > > > > > > > > > > > > > President Roosevelt is > > > > > > > > > > > > > not at all the same Fannie Mae that was created in > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1968 by Lyndon Johnson, > > > > > > > > > > > > > nor does the 1968 "Fannie Mae" resemble the Fannie > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mae that was created in > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1996-1999 by the Clinton Administration. Just a > > > > > > > > > > > > > quick "Reader's Digest" > > > > > > > > > > > > > abridged version; In 1968, President Johnson > > > > > > > > > > > > > privatized Fannie Mae in order > > > > > > > > > > > > > to remove it from the national budget. At this point, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fannie Mae began > > > > > > > > > > > > > operating as a "quasi-governmental" corporation, > > > > > > > > > > > > > (called a "government > > > > > > > > > > > > > sponsored enterprise") which generated profits for > > > > > > > > > > > > > stock holders while > > > > > > > > > > > > > enjoying the benefits of exemption from taxation and > > > > > > > > > > > > > oversight as well as > > > > > > > > > > > > > implied government backing. Freddie Mac was created > > > > > > > > > > > > > in 1970 in order to > > > > > > > > > > > > > prevent any monopolization of the GSE market. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fannie_Mae > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Fannie Mae that we are talking about in 2008, > > > > > > > > > > > > > was in fact a creation of > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Clinton Administration, and the 105th and 106th > > > > > > > > > > > > > Congress. One of the > > > > > > > > > > > > > biggest changes to Fannie Mae, as well as the overall > > > > > > > > > > > > > banking industry came > > > > > > > > > > > > > in 1996 when Alan Greenspan issued a ruling allowing > > > > > > > > > > > > > bank investment > > > > > > > > > > > > > affiliates to have up to a quarter of their business > > > > > > > > > > > > > in investments. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.nerepublican.com/index.php/2008/09/22/mules-rinos-and-very... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In particular, President Clinton, in essence, > > > > > > > > > > > > > repealed the > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Glass-Steagall" Act, and as I am sure most group > > > > > > > > > > > > > members recall, (as I do) > > > > > > > > > > > > > the theory was, that America's financial > > > > > > > > > > > > > competitiveness was being hampered > > > > > > > > > > > > > in comparison to Europe's and the emerging economies > > > > > > > > > > > > > of Russia and China. > > > > > > > > > > > > > That we needed the "Gramm-Leach-Bliley" Act, in order > > > > > > > > > > > > > to make America's > > > > > > > > > > > > > lending institutions viable and competitive. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you go and look at other posts in this thread, by > > > > > > > > > > > > > me, and other members, > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think the rest of the history falls into place.- > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
