Yeah, when I was young, I believed the Kennedy Assassination was a
Conspiracy as well...

Then I grew up, got older and smarter, and Learned to think for
myself.


On Oct 2, 8:04 pm, Princip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gaar your a republicunt thats axiomatic
> 'I was simply SHOWING YOU the tactics those YOU support are taking in
> this Election. '
> with regards to that comment
> Dont' you realise that Bush paid for the election in 2000
> you don't honestly think the whole thing was legit do you?
> I was 15 at the time and still in school and it was even then.
> I mean I know Americans in general are stupid just as people in my
> unfortunate country (UK) are,
> but you dont have to perpetually act stupid.
>
> On Oct 3, 3:45 am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Gaar,
>
> > Why in the fucking hell do you think I suggested you send your
> > evidence to the proper authorites? Are you a complete idiot? IF THEY
> > ARE DOING WHAT YOU CLAIM THEY ARE AND IT VIOLATES STATE OR FEDERAL
> > ELECTION LAWS BY ALL MEANS PROSECUTE THEM TO THE FULLEST EXTENT OF THE
> > LAW.
>
> > Now, is that clear enough to get thru your thick skull??? What the
> > fuck is wrong with you anyway?
>
> > On Oct 2, 6:18 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > So you do or don't agree with their tactics?
>
> > > On Oct 2, 4:14 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Gaar,
>
> > > > What the fuck are you babbling about now? Hell, I advised you to turn
> > > > them in to the proper authorites for prosecution if they were breaking
> > > > the law.
> > > > THAT'S showing support? What fucking planet are you from?
>
> > > > On Oct 2, 6:09 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Yeah...
>
> > > > > I was simply SHOWING YOU the tactics those YOU support are taking in
> > > > > this Election.
>
> > > > > Not surprising to me you would support such people.
>
> > > > > Also not surprising you don't care to Learn about the things that you
> > > > > support.
>
> > > > > On Oct 2, 4:01 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Gaar,
>
> > > > > > Such is life.
>
> > > > > > On Oct 2, 5:59 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > You seem to beleieve it hasn't already been done...
>
> > > > > > > The wheels of Justice turn ever so slowly.
>
> > > > > > > On Oct 2, 3:55 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Gaar,
>
> > > > > > > > Why show me? I advised you to present your evidence to the 
> > > > > > > > proper
> > > > > > > > authorities. Am I the proper authority? Get on it lad, times a-
> > > > > > > > wasting, there are evil-doers to be exposed.
> > > > > > > > Jump on it, y vaya con Dios.
>
> > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 5:29 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > >http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2008/10/ohio_vote_fraud.php
>
> > > > > > > > > Early voting is taking place in Ohio. Through the end of the 
> > > > > > > > > week,
> > > > > > > > > people can register and vote on the same day. The Ohio 
> > > > > > > > > Secretary of
> > > > > > > > > State Jennifer Brunner argues that they are merely "casting 
> > > > > > > > > their
> > > > > > > > > ballot" rather than "voting" so the fact that Ohio statute 
> > > > > > > > > requires 30
> > > > > > > > > days between registering and voting would not interfere.
>
> > > > > > > > > So here is what is happening today. People are showing up to 
> > > > > > > > > register
> > > > > > > > > and vote. There is no affirmative evidence that these people 
> > > > > > > > > have not
> > > > > > > > > registered or voted somewhere else. There is no control. 
> > > > > > > > > Normally in
> > > > > > > > > an election, partisan election monitors are allowed into 
> > > > > > > > > polling
> > > > > > > > > places so that they can police each other. But not in two 
> > > > > > > > > counties,
> > > > > > > > > Franklin and Montgomery, in Ohio. Brunner also issued an 
> > > > > > > > > advisory
> > > > > > > > > opinion to counties saying that they are not required to allow
> > > > > > > > > election monitors.
>
> > > > > > > > > Here you can see an election observer be turned away.
>
> > > > > > > > > (Video at Link provided)  Which I believe is empirical 
> > > > > > > > > evidence, of
> > > > > > > > > the First Order.
>
> > > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 3:19 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > Gaar,
>
> > > > > > > > > > Why wait? Turn your evidence in to the appropiate 
> > > > > > > > > > authorities right
> > > > > > > > > > now. They can at least issue an emergency restraining order 
> > > > > > > > > > and put a
> > > > > > > > > > stop to the practice right now. Go, run, hurry. Do your 
> > > > > > > > > > duty as a
> > > > > > > > > > citizen.
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 4:39 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, I heard that this last night...
>
> > > > > > > > > > > The bad thing is, there will not likely be a Court 
> > > > > > > > > > > challenge to this
> > > > > > > > > > > until AFTER they have stolen the Election.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 2:35 pm, Zebnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Democrats in Ohio are rounding up homeless people and 
> > > > > > > > > > > > paying them to
> > > > > > > > > > > > register and vote for Obama. Pitiful and completely 
> > > > > > > > > > > > illegal. Not that
> > > > > > > > > > > > it bothers Democrats to commit election fraud.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 2:03 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I am starting to believe that the Liberals around 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > here don't give a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > shit...
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > All they want is to get the Presidency and both 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Houses of Congress, no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > matter what.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > And then we wonder how we get into the shit we do...
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 6:30 am, "Keith In Tampa" <[EMAIL 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know if this helps or not, but to try and 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > clarify or to at least add
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > to the history of how this debacle started;
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > First, the "Fannie Mae" that was created in 1938 by 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > President Roosevelt is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > not at all the same Fannie Mae that was created in 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1968 by Lyndon Johnson,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > nor does the 1968 "Fannie Mae" resemble the  Fannie 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mae that was created in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1996-1999 by the Clinton Administration.  Just a 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > quick "Reader's Digest"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > abridged version; In 1968, President Johnson 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > privatized Fannie Mae in order
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > to remove it from the national budget. At this 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > point, Fannie Mae began
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > operating as a "quasi-governmental" corporation, 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > (called a "government
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > sponsored enterprise") which generated profits for 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > stock holders while
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > enjoying the benefits of exemption from taxation 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and oversight as well as
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > implied government backing. Freddie Mac was created 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > in 1970 in order to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > prevent any monopolization of the GSE market.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fannie_Mae
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  The Fannie Mae that we are talking about in 2008, 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > was in fact a creation of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Clinton Administration, and the 105th and 106th 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Congress.   One of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > biggest changes to Fannie Mae, as well as the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > overall banking industry came
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > in 1996 when Alan Greenspan issued a ruling 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > allowing bank investment
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > affiliates to have up to a quarter of their 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > business in investments.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.nerepublican.com/index.php/2008/09/22/mules-rinos-and-very...
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  In particular, President Clinton, in essence,  
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > repealed the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Glass-Steagall" Act, and as I am sure most group 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > members  recall, (as I do)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the theory was, that America's financial 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > competitiveness was being hampered
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > in comparison to Europe's and the emerging 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > economies of Russia and China.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > That we needed the "Gramm-Leach-Bliley" Act, in 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > order to make America's
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > lending institutions viable and competitive.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you go and look at other posts in this thread, 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > by me, and other members,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think the rest of the history falls into place.- 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to