I liked the article and sent it to a few friends. On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:06 AM, Cold Water <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Your self indulgence proves nothing. You were not polled by me. I don't > poll online because most people online are liars. LOLOLOLOL > > <yawn> > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "wncs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PoliticalForum" <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 8:01 AM > Subject: Re: Why Some Women Hate Sarah Palin > > > > Maybe I can clarify a few things. I do not hate Sarah Palin. However, > I do not think she is the best choice for VP of this nation. Those are > two completely separate things. > Secondly, the fact that I do not think she would make a good VP has > nothing to do with "me" because I don't fit any of those criteria: > a) I'm not too liberal to function... I'm middle of the road > b) I'm not fat > c) I'm not ugly > Sorry to disprove your assertion, but I don't hate Palin, and the fact > that she won't make a good VP has nothing to do with me and everything > to do with her. > > On Oct 3, 7:27 am, Cold Water <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My personal polling indicates the women who hate Palin are either: > > > > a) Too liberal to function > > b) Fat > > c) Ugly > > d) All of the above > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Travis > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 7:20 AM > > Subject: Re: Why Some Women Hate Sarah Palin > > > > I am glad I have no knowledge of my ex's whereabouts. and haven't for 30 > > years. Excellent article. thanks. > > > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 5:01 AM, Cold Water <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Why Some Women Hate Sarah Palin > > By Belinda Luscombe > > > > Some polls are suggesting that after gaining an initial bump, McCain's > > campaign is being hobbled by Sarah Palin's vice-presidential candidacy. > > The voters who are deserting her fastest, some of whom are even calling > on > > her to withdraw, are mostly women. > > > > Ah, women, the consistently, tragically underestimated constituency. What > > the Democrats learned during the primaries and the Republicans might now > > be finding out the hard way, I learned at my very academic, well-regarded > > all-girls high school: that is never to discount the ability of women to > > open a robust, committed, well-thought-out vat of hatred for another > girl. > > > > Women are weapons-grade haters. Hillary Clinton knows it. Palin knows it > > too. When women get their hate on, they don't just dislike, or find > > disfavor with, or sort of not really appreciate. They loathe — deeply, > > richly, sustainingly. I do not say this to disparage my gender; women > also > > love in more or less the same way. > > > > When men disagree, the steps to resolution are reasonably clear and > > unsophisticated. Acts of physical violence are visited upon one another's > > person or property, and the whole thing blows over. Women? Nu-unh. We > > savor the discord. We draw it out. We share our contempt with our > friends, > > like a useful stock tip, or really good salsa. And then we all go hate > > together: a mutually encouraging group activity for when the book group > > gets quiet. > > > > The hatred women have for Sarah Palin, and others had for Hillary before > > her, is not necessarily about politics. Anybody can run the numbers on > how > > many people Palin's pro-life, pro-gun, socially conservative policies > will > > seduce and how many they will alienate. Rather, the test that the McCain > > campaign failed to put her through was the Abbotsleigh Ladies College > > test. (Named after my high school. Go, green and gold!). It's a simple > > three-point pass-fail exam: Will the other girls like her? > > > > Here's why Palin doesn't make the grade: > > > > 1. She's too pretty. This is very bad news. At school, pretty girls tend > > to be liked only by other pretty girls. The rest of us, whose looks hover > > somewhere around underwhelming, resent them and whisper archly of their > > "unearned attention." So, if everyone calls your candidate "hot," you're > > in a whole mess of trouble. If the Pakistani head-of-state more or less > > hits on her, well, yes, she'll get a sympathy vote, but we're in > > Dukakis-in-the-tank territory. It's an admiration vaporizer. (Of course a > > candidate can't be too ugly, or it will scare the men, who are clearly > > shallow as a gender.) > > > > 2. She's too confident. This also bodes ill. Women have self-esteem > > issues. But they also have other-women's-esteem issues. As almost any > > woman — from the head of the Budgerigar Breeders association to Queen > > Elizabeth — can attest, it's almost impossible to get confidence right. > > Too timid and you're a pushover. Too self-aggrandizing and you're a bad > > word unless it's about a dog, or Project Runway's Kenley. Or Michelle, my > > best friend until 9th grade, after she won that debating prize and got > > cocky. > > > > 3. She could embarrass us. History is not on Palin's side. Every time a > > woman gets a plum job, be she Hewlett-Packard's ex-boss, Carly Fiorina, > or > > CBS's Katie Couric, there's always that whispery fear that people will > > think she got the job just because she's a woman. So if things don't go > > well — and a couple of YouTube clips have suggested that they're > certainly > > not going well for Palin — women are the first to turn on her for making > > it harder for the rest of us to louse up at work. > > > > The fact of the matter is once a female decides it's over with another > > female, it's like an end-stage marriage. No matter how seemingly benign, > > every attribute becomes an affront: the hair, the voice, the husband, the > > moose-shooting, the glasses, the big family, the making rape victims pay > > for their own rape test kits. > > > > I know, I know. With all this extra baggage a female candidate has to > > bear, the chances of finding a woman whom other women won't hate seem > > skinnier than last year's jeans. But don't despair, if all else fails, we > > could just do what we always do and just vote in some guy. It's worked so > > well for us in the past. > > > > a.. Find this article at: > > b..http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1846832,00.html- Hide > > quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > -- *~@):~{> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
